53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2014.7039834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the definiteness of the weighted Laplacian and its connection to effective resistance

Abstract: This work explores the definiteness of the weighted graph Laplacian matrix with negative edge weights. The definiteness of the weighted Laplacian is studied in terms of certain matrices that are related via congruent and similarity transformations. For a graph with a single negative weight edge, we show that the weighted Laplacian becomes indefinite if the magnitude of the negative weight is less than the inverse of the effective resistance between the two incident nodes. This result is extended to multiple ne… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 5: Theorem 6 gives two necessary and sufficient conditions for L G being PSD with only one zero eigenvalue. It generalizes the results in [20][21][22] that apply to those graphs with a special location distribution of negative weighted edges. Note that the sequential inclusion describes an expansion from a single node to the whole concerned set (V k+1 − \V k − refers to the node to be included in one step).…”
Section: Interpreting Graph Laplacian Definiteness By Effective Rsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Remark 5: Theorem 6 gives two necessary and sufficient conditions for L G being PSD with only one zero eigenvalue. It generalizes the results in [20][21][22] that apply to those graphs with a special location distribution of negative weighted edges. Note that the sequential inclusion describes an expansion from a single node to the whole concerned set (V k+1 − \V k − refers to the node to be included in one step).…”
Section: Interpreting Graph Laplacian Definiteness By Effective Rsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…So constraint (20f) is equivalent to (19f) following the same idea as in (11). Then, according to [44], problem (20) has the same feasible set as (19), and relaxing the rank constraint (20h) gives a convex problem. The convex relaxation of OPF has been well studied, which is shown to be exact in most cases [45].…”
Section: B Transient Stability Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, it is possible that relative outputs ζ(t) do not converge to a point in I even when all the nodes are in their steady states with the equilibrium input u(t) = 0. Some typical examples are given in [6], [9], where the networks of single integrators with edge functions represented by (6) We will further discuss these conditions in Section IV. Before we proceed, we provide the following proposition showing an important property of the nodes only incident to strictly positive edges.…”
Section: B Signed Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where L e (G) ∈ R m×m represents the edge-Laplacian of the graph G and can be expressed as, Zelazo and Burger (2014). Also, using the fact that the underlying graph contains a spanning-tree G τ we partition the edge states after a suitable permutation as follows,…”
Section: Single Integratormentioning
confidence: 99%