1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00017849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the decomposition of the J-integral for 3D crack problems

Abstract: The extended J-integral for 3D linear elastostatic crack problems and its application to mixed mode problems is investigated. In 3D, the decomposition of the J-integral into its parts corresponding to the symmetric mode I and both antisymmetric modes II and III is derived explicitly. The range of validity of the decomposition method is also discussed in the framework of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM). It is shown analytically that in a general mixed mode case the antisymmetric part of the J-integral … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach has been frequently used along with the domain representation of the J-integral for the computation of SIFs (Raju and Shivakumar, 1990;Shivakumar and Raju, 1992;Nikishkov and Atluri, 1987b;Huber et al, 1993). However, decomposing the crack tip field into symmetric and antisymmetric fields introduces error, and is mainly applicable to a mesh that is symmetric with respect to the crack face.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been frequently used along with the domain representation of the J-integral for the computation of SIFs (Raju and Shivakumar, 1990;Shivakumar and Raju, 1992;Nikishkov and Atluri, 1987b;Huber et al, 1993). However, decomposing the crack tip field into symmetric and antisymmetric fields introduces error, and is mainly applicable to a mesh that is symmetric with respect to the crack face.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The J 1 integral (or J integral) can also be used to extract mixed mode SIFs, with some auxiliary operation. One approach is to decompose the displacement and stress fields into symmetric and antisymmetric portions with a structured mesh along the crack front, then the three modes of the J integral can be extracted directly [114][115][116][117]. The other method known as the M integral (or interaction energy integral), was developed by introducing asymptotic fields as an auxiliary solution [108] has been extended in (X)FEM [118,31] and BEM [119].…”
Section: Computation Of Stress Intensity Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove path or domain independence of such transformations explicitly is often more cumbersome (e.g. Huber et al 1993;Rigby and Aliabadi 1998) than the convenient direct use of (5). To prove (4), we have, in short, for the terms in P l j the steps…”
Section: Decomposition Of the Energy Momentum Tensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to obtain the stress intensity factors K I , K II and K III from J . The most general and numerically stable method (Huber et al 1993), which is exploited here, is the decomposition method (Ishikawa et al 1979). In this method, J is first split into two parts J = J S + J A where J S and J A are calculated from the symmetric and anti-symmetric elastic fields about the crack plane, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%