20th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-3501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Current Limits of Simulating Gas Giant Entry Flows in an Expansion Tube

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 provides the freestream conditions estimated using Pitot [15], which is an equilibrium expansion tube and shock tunnel analysis code that uses the tube configuration parameters and measured shock velocities as an input to calculate these properties.…”
Section: A Condition Selection and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 provides the freestream conditions estimated using Pitot [15], which is an equilibrium expansion tube and shock tunnel analysis code that uses the tube configuration parameters and measured shock velocities as an input to calculate these properties.…”
Section: A Condition Selection and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the measurements themselves generally have an uncertainty of 0.2-0.3 km/s, this appears to be an acceptable range. To ensure, however, that this degree of variation would not significantly impact the results, an analysis was conducted using UQ's in-house code PITOT [103,104]. In this analysis, the shock speed in the shock tube was manually set to the nominal experimental value of 4.1 km/s (see Table 3.1), and the test section pressure was varied until the same difference in secondary shock speed was achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 5 and 10% of flow enthalpy can be stored as static enthalpy and, as a result, while the total enthalpy of the free-stream can be achieved, the flow Mach number will be lower than desired [30]. Test conditions for scaled models will be different and determining scaled post-shock conditions is necessary.…”
Section: Post Shock Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%