1984
DOI: 10.1002/cpa.3160370104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the crossing rule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Friedland, Robbin and Sylvester [8] and Berger and Friedland [5] gave further nonlinear versions of the above results by considering odd maps φ from S p to matrices of rank n in M n (R), S n (R) and M n,n+1 (R) respectively. In this paper ( §4) we generalize these results to odd maps from S p to rank n − 1 matrices in M n (R) and S n (R).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Friedland, Robbin and Sylvester [8] and Berger and Friedland [5] gave further nonlinear versions of the above results by considering odd maps φ from S p to matrices of rank n in M n (R), S n (R) and M n,n+1 (R) respectively. In this paper ( §4) we generalize these results to odd maps from S p to rank n − 1 matrices in M n (R) and S n (R).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See the works [13], [11], [2], [8], [5], [3], [4], [7] and many others. Roughly speaking these problems are divided into two classes depending on whether F is algebraically closed or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the principles on which these ideas rest are well known from the perturbation theory of multiple eigenvalues; see Davis and Kahan (1970), Friedland (1978) or Kato (1966). The dimension argument is essentially the same as the phenomenon known in quantum mechanics as the "crossing rule" of von Neuman and Wigner (1929); see also Friedland, Robbin and Sylvester (1984).…”
Section: ) Stop If [I-('i(c)-a*)2]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we rename them for the present section to look natural as a classification with a real constant a satisfying 0 < a < 1, or to a hermitian family. where the real constants a, jS, y and 3 satisfy 0 < a < 1 , 7 >-(ft 2 …”
Section: Proof Considermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , n) such that And we denote this equivalence relation by By using the above operations a) and b), it is easy to see that any matrix family is equivalent to some <5 l5 ..., B n > where B l9 B 2) ..., B n are linearly independent and none of their nonzero linear combinations is equal to a scalar multiple of identity. Let us define a word indicating this property for later convenience.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%