1995
DOI: 10.1016/0956-7151(94)00319-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the creep of directionally solidified MoSi2-Mo5Si3 eutectics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of the volume fractions of different oxidation products indicates that the MoO 3 is the most abundant reaction product, which is consistent with the large mass loss observed after the transient mass gain during the TG studies on each of the investigated alloys (Figure 1). It is also obvious from Table III that Table III, it is obvious that the volume fraction of MoO 3 generated by Reaction [6] (the oxidation of Mo 3 (Si m Al n )) in the case of both the Al-containing alloys is slightly higher than that in Reaction [5] (the oxidation of Mo 3 Si) affecting the MSB alloy. Both the larger amount of MoO 3 formed and the presence of Al 2 O 3 with a greater density than that of SiO 2 are responsible for the higher transient mass gain as well as the greater mass loss recorded for the Al-containing alloys than for the MSB.…”
Section: Effect Of Volume Fraction Of Products and Competitive Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison of the volume fractions of different oxidation products indicates that the MoO 3 is the most abundant reaction product, which is consistent with the large mass loss observed after the transient mass gain during the TG studies on each of the investigated alloys (Figure 1). It is also obvious from Table III that Table III, it is obvious that the volume fraction of MoO 3 generated by Reaction [6] (the oxidation of Mo 3 (Si m Al n )) in the case of both the Al-containing alloys is slightly higher than that in Reaction [5] (the oxidation of Mo 3 Si) affecting the MSB alloy. Both the larger amount of MoO 3 formed and the presence of Al 2 O 3 with a greater density than that of SiO 2 are responsible for the higher transient mass gain as well as the greater mass loss recorded for the Al-containing alloys than for the MSB.…”
Section: Effect Of Volume Fraction Of Products and Competitive Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Such a large discrepancy is attributed to the formation of pores and cracks (Figures 4(b) and 8(a)) in the oxide scale, which relieve the volume strains. Furthermore, comparison of the data shown in Table III indicates that the volume expansions accompanying the oxidation of Mo 3 Si (Reactions [5], [9], and [10]) are greater than those due to the corresponding reactions affecting the Mo 3 Si m Al n phase (Reactions [6], [13], and [14]). Thus, it is inferred that the volume expansion strain is not responsible for the higher mass loss of the Al-containing alloys by cyclic oxidation.…”
Section: Residual Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Single crystal studies on Mo 3 Si showed anomalous yield behavior and a lack of plastic deformation due to the fact that only three independent slip systems can occur [72]. MoSi 2 -Mo 5 Si 3 composites have superior creep behavior as compared to monolithic MoSi 2 [73]. Mo 3 Si-Mo 5 Si 3 composites showed excellent hardness, due to the presence of Mo 3 Si, but had a low toughness [74].…”
Section: Mechanical Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6] Moreover, creep resistance of directionally solidified MoSi 2 /Mo 5 Si 3 eutectics has been reported to be far better than that of single phase MoSi 2 . 7,8) Hence, it is expected that high temperature strength of NbSi 2 can be improved by incorporation with Nb 5 Si 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%