2005
DOI: 10.1080/09500830500383563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the correlation between self-interstitial cluster diffusivity and irradiation-induced swelling in Fe–Cr alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
65
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a matter of fact, solute atoms can be transported by defects towards these nucleation sites, causing the clusters to grow in size. The effective ''pinning effect'' of solute atoms on SIA loops emerges from several studies [6][7][8], whereas the systematic arising of a vacancy drag effect in iron dilute alloys has been recently shown [9] to be a very effective means of solute transport towards defect sinks in RPV steels, and could hence confirm this mechanism. In particular, Mn is expected to have a specifically strong effect on SIA-loop mobility because of the strong interaction between Mn and crowdion, in analogy with the effect of Cr [7] and because it is known to efficiently diffuse via a dumbbell mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As a matter of fact, solute atoms can be transported by defects towards these nucleation sites, causing the clusters to grow in size. The effective ''pinning effect'' of solute atoms on SIA loops emerges from several studies [6][7][8], whereas the systematic arising of a vacancy drag effect in iron dilute alloys has been recently shown [9] to be a very effective means of solute transport towards defect sinks in RPV steels, and could hence confirm this mechanism. In particular, Mn is expected to have a specifically strong effect on SIA-loop mobility because of the strong interaction between Mn and crowdion, in analogy with the effect of Cr [7] and because it is known to efficiently diffuse via a dumbbell mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…When the solute density becomes high enough, the effective range of the traps will start to overlap and the trapping force will decrease again. It was shown, with the support of molecular-dynamics simulations on large simulation boxes, with an alloy cohesive model that closely fits the ab initio data, 16 that this model [7][8][9] of trapping in Fe-Cr reproduced the measured swelling minima at around 9 at. % Cr, assuming that the change in the rate of SIA loop diffusion is the main cause of the concentration dependency of swelling in Fe-Cr.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A phenomenological model of the interstitial cluster diffusion in Fe-Cr has successfully explained some of the concentration dependency of the swelling under neutron irradiation. [7][8][9][10][11][12] The model used data from ab initio calculations, 13,14 which showed that a single ͗111͘ self-interstitial atom ͑SIA͒ has a strong long-ranged attractive interaction with solute Cr atoms along the line of compression ͑and glide͒. The SIAs in an a / 2͗111͘ loop move independently, dragging the others along after they have moved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…higher swelling rates under neutron compared to Frenkel-pair-producing electron irradiation [36,37]; and the absence of void lattices in 1 MeV electron irradiated materials. The framework of the model also accounts for the minimum swelling rate in Fe-Cr alloys at ~10 at% Cr [38] and the absence of copper precipitate growth in Fe-Cu alloys at temperature less than 300°C [39]. The model owes its success to the recognition of two distinguishing features of defect production by high-energy recoils: first, the formation of thermally-stable clusters of self-interstitial atoms (SIAs) directly in displacement cascades, fact revealed both experimentally [40][41][42][43][44] and in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations [45][46][47][48]; and, second, the one-dimensional motion of the SIA clusters [46,[49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%