2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2022.114905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the cooling rate evolution of asteroid fragments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculations ignore the effects related to porosity, shape, atmospheric blanketing, impact-related heating, and internal heat production, which for the most part would have slowed cooling further. Ren et al (2022) present a more general treatment of these subjects. Herrin et al (2010) describe a thermal history for AhS.…”
Section: Thermal History Of Ahs and Other Polymict Ureilitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculations ignore the effects related to porosity, shape, atmospheric blanketing, impact-related heating, and internal heat production, which for the most part would have slowed cooling further. Ren et al (2022) present a more general treatment of these subjects. Herrin et al (2010) describe a thermal history for AhS.…”
Section: Thermal History Of Ahs and Other Polymict Ureilitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeled curves for different cooling times are indicated by thick colored lines (cooling times labeled on left), while modeled curves for different depths within each fragment are normalized by % radius and are indicated by thin, black arrowed lines (% radius depths labeled on right). Monotonic cooling curve for acapulcoite‐transitional fragments (0.01% depth) at an initial temperature of 1025 °C (gray dashed curve) is essentially identical to the lodranite 0.01% depth cooling curve, demonstrating that collisional fragments cool at similar rates independent of initial temperature (Ren et al., 2022). High‐temperature (>750 °C) lodranite cooling rates are best reproduced by fragments in the size range of 300 m to 10 km, which experienced cooling times between several and ~20,000 yr. (Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the planar solution, the temperature profile is self‐similar in the Boltzmann variable η=x/2kt, where x is the depth below the surface. Conversely, η is a constant for a given temperature, which shows that the cooling rate at a given temperature declines proportional to 1/ t (Ren et al., 2022; see their equation 6). Therefore, the cooling rate of fragments after collisional disruption, but before reassembly, at any fixed temperature decays at 1/ t so that cooling rates measured at a given closure temperature provide a constraint on both fragment radius and reassembly time scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation