Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2005.1570790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Control of the Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton (BLEEX)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
249
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 446 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
249
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although essential for a large range of applications, this topic has not been extensively investigated in the wearable robotics community yet. For instance, BLEEX uses a low impedance (high-sensitivity) controller [1] while HAL uses electromyography (EMG). More recently, other works have also investigated admittance control with positive acceleration feedback [5] and interaction force feedback with modelbased gravity compensation [3].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although essential for a large range of applications, this topic has not been extensively investigated in the wearable robotics community yet. For instance, BLEEX uses a low impedance (high-sensitivity) controller [1] while HAL uses electromyography (EMG). More recently, other works have also investigated admittance control with positive acceleration feedback [5] and interaction force feedback with modelbased gravity compensation [3].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these and other typical applications, it is desirable to measure the interaction force between human and the robot. More specifically, this sensory capability may enable or enhance the robot's ability to perform tasks such as load carrying [1], trajectory tracking [2], and being imperceptible (i.e. transparent) to the user [3], [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have known a huge expansion in the last decade as they are continually attracting the scientific and the medical community due to the continuous increasing rate of dependent people [16], [17]. Research in this field has started in the sixties and has tended to assist depending people by coupling the exoskeleton with their limbs in the aim of allowing the wearer to regain natural movements [8]. The key issue when dealing with wearable exoskeletons concerns the interaction between wearer and the exoskeleton from a physical or a cognitive point of view and ideally from both [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key issue when dealing with wearable exoskeletons concerns the interaction between wearer and the exoskeleton from a physical or a cognitive point of view and ideally from both [19]. The most developed exoskeleton research projets are based on physical interaction, through force interfaces, whether by imposing predefined movements [28,13], or by using forces sensors between the exoskeleton and the wearer and/or the inverse dynamics of the wearer body [8,20,5,6]. One of the major drawbacks of this physical interaction mode is the poorness reactivity of the exoskeleton caused by the time delay between the wearer's intention estimation and the control input applied to the exoskeleton [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation