1986
DOI: 10.1515/ijsl.1986.58.91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the context of situation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the above facts, it is suggested that a sociolinguistic and social-psychological framework, similar to those proposed by Halliday (1978), Halliday and Hasan (1985), Hasan (1978Hasan ( , 1985, Giles and Powesland (1975), and Peng (1974Peng ( , 1986, provides us with a framework that can explain lingusitic behavior in societies. In the following analysis I will specifically use the concepts field and tenor in the sense in which these concepts have been used in systemic linguistics [see Halliday (1978), and Halliday and Hasan (1985)l.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the above facts, it is suggested that a sociolinguistic and social-psychological framework, similar to those proposed by Halliday (1978), Halliday and Hasan (1985), Hasan (1978Hasan ( , 1985, Giles and Powesland (1975), and Peng (1974Peng ( , 1986, provides us with a framework that can explain lingusitic behavior in societies. In the following analysis I will specifically use the concepts field and tenor in the sense in which these concepts have been used in systemic linguistics [see Halliday (1978), and Halliday and Hasan (1985)l.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…the cluster of socially meaningful participant relationship, both permanent attributes of the participants and role relationships that are specific to the situation" (Halliday, 1978: 143). However, the concepts of field and fenor would be linked with Peng's (1986) insight. In the context of the analyses done in this study, insight means the attempt to achieve an explanation or interpretation of what the text is about when it is measured against or placed in the 'context of situation' as a background.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instances are labelled I --X. The data were translated and analyzed according to Insight theory of Peng (1986).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the social stratification in Nigeria (where the linguistic polarization between the dominant and dominated groups, mirrored through code-alternation in Soyinka's and Achebe's novels, reflects the social polarization between the ''powerful'' and ''powerless'' social classes in the country), and the fact that Nigeria is fractured along ethnic and religious lines, it is suggested that a sociolinguistic and social-psychological framework, similar to those proposed by Halliday (1978), Halliday and Hasan (1985), Hasan (1978Hasan ( , 1985, Giles and Powesland (1975), and Peng (1974Peng ( , 1986, provides us with a framework that can explain linguistic behavior in societies. Consequently, in the ensuing analyses, I will specifically use the concepts of field and tenor in the sense in which these concepts have been used in systemic-functional linguistics, but will link these concepts with Peng's insight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%