1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1360(199805)7:3<169::aid-mcda189>3.0.co;2-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the construction of fuzzy preference structures

Abstract: In this paper, we analyse the generalization of the classical method of the construction of a preference structure from a reflexive binary relation to the case of fuzzy binary relations. According to our approach, there are two interesting fuzzy preference structures we can construct from a given reflexive fuzzy binary relation. These two fuzzy preference structures correspond to the two extreme solutions of the system of functional equations in the method of Fodor and Roubens. We also prove that only one of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. For each of them, the three conditions (1), (2) and (3) that a fuzzy preference structure must satisfy will be examined.…”
Section: Summary Of the Aggregation Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4. For each of them, the three conditions (1), (2) and (3) that a fuzzy preference structure must satisfy will be examined.…”
Section: Summary Of the Aggregation Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important issue in fuzzy preference structures is the one related to their construction from a given reflexive fuzzy outranking relation [2,15,22]. One way of dealing with this issue consists of defining one of the three components of the fuzzy preference structure using a well-known t-norm such as the Łukasiewicz t-norm or min t-norm and then to define the two other components in such a way that the three components fulfil the conditions of a fuzzy preference structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the assessments on "theoretical standard" and "level of innovation" are aggregated to generate an intermediate assessment on E I (2) , as shown by equations (18), (19), (20), and (21) …”
Section: Er Modeling Framework For Randd Project Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, generate the assessment on "theoretical and innovation level" (E I(3) ) by aggregating E I (2) and the assessment on individual design: …”
Section: Er Modeling Framework For Randd Project Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation