2009
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2009.051053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the construction of 2-connected virtual backbone in wireless networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference [24] provides a Connecting Dominating Set Augmentation (CDSA) algorithm to form a 2-connected virtual backbone that can resist the failure of one wireless node. The key idea of their algorithm is to build a CDS first and then augment it to be 2-connected by adding new nodes to the backbone.…”
Section: Kmcdsbased Fault-tolerant Virtual Backbone Construction:mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [24] provides a Connecting Dominating Set Augmentation (CDSA) algorithm to form a 2-connected virtual backbone that can resist the failure of one wireless node. The key idea of their algorithm is to build a CDS first and then augment it to be 2-connected by adding new nodes to the backbone.…”
Section: Kmcdsbased Fault-tolerant Virtual Backbone Construction:mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A centralized algorithm and a distributed local decision algorithm are proposed. The authors in [20] provide a Connecting Dominating Set Augmentation algorithm to form a 2-connected virtual backbone that can resist the failure of one wireless node. Constructing a connected k-dominating set (1-k-CDS) is examined in [21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists some works in [13], [14] that describes the construction of k-connected m-dominating sets for fault tolerance. To this end, they have proposed two approximation algorithms -Connecting Dominating Set Augmentation (CDSA) and k-connected m-dominating set (k, mCDS) -to construct a k-connected virtual backbone which can accommodate the failure of one wireless node.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%