2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00222-003-0299-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the conjectures of Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer in characteristic p >0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof shall be given in Corollaries 2.1.5 and 2.1.11. Note that, by [KT03], X p (A/K (p) ∞ ) as a submodule of (N 1 ∞ ) ∨ is also Λ-torsion. Formula (17) in section 2.2 will define f A/K Finally, we can state our analogue of the Iwasawa Main Conjecture: Theorem 1.3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proof shall be given in Corollaries 2.1.5 and 2.1.11. Note that, by [KT03], X p (A/K (p) ∞ ) as a submodule of (N 1 ∞ ) ∨ is also Λ-torsion. Formula (17) in section 2.2 will define f A/K Finally, we can state our analogue of the Iwasawa Main Conjecture: Theorem 1.3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof is based on a generalization of a lemma of σ-linear algebra that was used to prove the cohomological formula of the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture (see [KT03,Lemma 3.6]). Section 3.2 investigates the consequences of Theorem 1.3 in the direction of a p-adic Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Write K = F q (t). The main result of [KT03] (specialized to elliptic curves) states that (10) holds whenever X(K, E) is finite (in fact, it suffices that…”
Section: The Proof Of Theorem 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After these preliminary considerations Theorem 1.6 follows immediately from the comparison of formulas in the previous two chapters. We deduce Corollary 1.7 by comparing this theorem with results of Milne [14] and Kato-Trihan [11]. For every f ∈ C 0 (X, M) and µ ∈ M(X, R) we define the modulus µ( f ) of f with respect to µ as the Z-submodule of R generated by the elements µ( f −1 (g)), where 0 = g ∈ M. We also define the integral of f on X with respect to µ as the sum:…”
Section: (Contents)mentioning
confidence: 99%