1989
DOI: 10.1080/00085030.1989.10757432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Conclusiveness of Skull Identification Via the Video Superimposition Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The anatomical comparison of skulls and faces using photographs, otherwise known as craniofacial superimposition, has been a popular tool for excluding individuals in difficult‐to‐solve cases of questioned skeletal identity . Sometimes the method has been used as an adjunct to other lines of biological evidence , but more controversially (see e.g., ), it has also been used as the main line of evidence for identification when other comparative techniques such as DNA or radiographic comparison are not possible .…”
Section: Previously Reported Subject‐to‐camera Distances (Floor Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anatomical comparison of skulls and faces using photographs, otherwise known as craniofacial superimposition, has been a popular tool for excluding individuals in difficult‐to‐solve cases of questioned skeletal identity . Sometimes the method has been used as an adjunct to other lines of biological evidence , but more controversially (see e.g., ), it has also been used as the main line of evidence for identification when other comparative techniques such as DNA or radiographic comparison are not possible .…”
Section: Previously Reported Subject‐to‐camera Distances (Floor Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique of superimposition as a means of identification has a long history (Grüner et al, 1959;Grüner, 1993). photographic and video superimposition has proven to be very successful in the identification of unknown individuals and the courts have accepted identifications made by this technique as reliable (Chandra Sekharan, 1971;Colonna et al, 1980;Cai and Lan, 1982;Dorion,1983;Robert, 1983;Bassian et al, 1986;Iten, 1987;Cai et al, 1989;Helmer, 1989;Cai and Lan, 1993;Seta and Yoshino, 1993;Maples et al, 1994;Shahrom, 1996;Taylor and Brown, 1998;Jayaprakash et al, 2001). With the availability of current technology the process takes about one hour and can effectively demonstrate consistencies and inconsistencies between a skull and photograph used for comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die gewonnenen Daten wurden im Rechenzentrum der Christian-Albrechts-Universit~it Kiel statistisch bearbeitet (Details s. Helmer, Schimmler, Rieger 1989). Bei der Auswertung der Ergebnisse wurde yon der Annahme ausgegangen, dab die individuelle Morphologie eines Sch~idels bereits durch die Position einiger weniger ausgew~ihlter Punkte charakterisiert werden kann.…”
Section: Materials Und Methodenunclassified