2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2009.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the computation of structured singular values and pseudospectra

Abstract: Structured singular values and pseudospectra play an important role in assessing the properties of a linear system under structured perturbations. This paper discusses computational aspects of structured pseudospectra for structures that admit an eigenvalue minimization characterization, including the classes of real, skew-symmetric, Hermitian, and Hamiltonian perturbations. For all these structures we develop algorithms that require O(n 2) operations per grid point, combining the Schur decomposition with a La… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach is not limited to"small" perturbations in the polynomials' coefficients and general vector norms can be used in principle to represent uncertainty (in the paper quadratic and l ∞ norms are considered). The resulting optimization is non-convex and computationally demanding for large problems, although tight convex bounds (and techniques for improving them) have been reported in the literature [16], [17], [14], [20], [22], [29], [33], [34], [35]. Algorithms combining the technique presented in this work with aspects of [24] and [25] also seem possible and will be reported in a future publication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach is not limited to"small" perturbations in the polynomials' coefficients and general vector norms can be used in principle to represent uncertainty (in the paper quadratic and l ∞ norms are considered). The resulting optimization is non-convex and computationally demanding for large problems, although tight convex bounds (and techniques for improving them) have been reported in the literature [16], [17], [14], [20], [22], [29], [33], [34], [35]. Algorithms combining the technique presented in this work with aspects of [24] and [25] also seem possible and will be reported in a future publication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second column, it is presented the set of block diagonal matrices denoted by BLK. In the third, fourth and fifth columns, it is presented the upper and lower bounds By using the algorithm [13], one can obtain the perturbation * * ∆  with In Table 5, it is presented the comparison of the bounds of SSV computed by MUSSV and the algorithm [13] for the matrix 5 A given bellow. In the very first column, it is presented the dimension of the matrix 5 A .…”
Section: 0000mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be done by computing the Hamiltonian pseudospectrum Λ τ ðH; CÞ with the method of [19] and testing whether or not Λ τ ðH; CÞ ∩ iR ¼ ∅. Alternatively, we compute the eigenvalues of H − τJ and H þ τJ .…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%