[Proceedings 1988] 29th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science 1988
DOI: 10.1109/sfcs.1988.21948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the complexity of omega -automata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
397
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 480 publications
(399 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
397
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the universality problem for Büchi automata can be reduced to such games, but the construction that we propose in Section 3 cannot be used. More involved constructionsà la Safra are needed [20].…”
Section: Alg For ω-Regular Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the universality problem for Büchi automata can be reduced to such games, but the construction that we propose in Section 3 cannot be used. More involved constructionsà la Safra are needed [20].…”
Section: Alg For ω-Regular Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we give a short exposition of Safra's determinization [Saf88] and show how to improve it. We replace the constant node names with dynamic names, which allow us to simulate the index appearance record 3 construction within the deterministic automaton.…”
Section: Determinization Of Büchi Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safra's Construction. Here we describe Safra's determinization construction [Saf88,Saf89]. The construction takes an NBW and constructs an equivalent DRW.…”
Section: Determinization Of Büchi Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, one can resort to Repeat-Converse-Deterministic PDL (repeat-CDPDL), a variant of PDL that allows for expressing the finiteness of trees and for which satisfiability is EXPTIME-complete [30]. This upper bound, however, is established using sophisticated infinite-tree automata-theoretic techniques (cf., e.g., [24]), which so far have resisted attempts at practically efficient implementation [25,28], due to the use of Safra's determinization construction [23] and parity games [18]. The main advantage of our approach here is that we use only automata on finite trees, which require a much "lighter" automata-theoretic machinery.…”
Section: Proposition 4 ([30]) a 2watamentioning
confidence: 99%