2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-018-0318-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the complexity and verification of quantum random circuit sampling

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
293
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(305 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
293
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we connect this result to the output distributions of "quantum supremacy" schemes. In all schemes that rely on the Stockmeyer argument, the problem instances are defined in terms of a unitary that is randomly chosen from some restricted family, e.g., linear optical circuits in the case of boson sampling [14] or random universal circuits [15,17] in a qubit architecture . Specifically, we prove that with high probability over the choice of the random unitary, the distribution over outputs associated with this unitary is exponentially flat.…”
Section: Hardness Of Exact Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, we connect this result to the output distributions of "quantum supremacy" schemes. In all schemes that rely on the Stockmeyer argument, the problem instances are defined in terms of a unitary that is randomly chosen from some restricted family, e.g., linear optical circuits in the case of boson sampling [14] or random universal circuits [15,17] in a qubit architecture . Specifically, we prove that with high probability over the choice of the random unitary, the distribution over outputs associated with this unitary is exponentially flat.…”
Section: Hardness Of Exact Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we rigorously prove for a broad range of sampling problems, specifically for boson sampling [14], universal random circuit sampling [15,17], IQP circuit sampling [16,24], and sampling from post-selected-universal 2-designs [20-22, 28, 29] that they cannot be efficiently certified from classical samples and a description of the target probability distribution. Ironically, it turns out that the same property of a distribution that allows to prove the known approximatehardness results also forbids their non-interactive sampleefficient device independent certification, to the effect that with the known proof methods both properties cannot be achieved simultaneously in such schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In analogy to the family of circuits with random gates drawn from an elementary set for qubits, we refer to this architecture as to CV random circuit sampling [26]. Finite resolution in the homodyne detection ensures that we can associate well-defined probabilities to the continuous measurement outcomes through binning.…”
Section: Random Circuit Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While error-corrected scalable quantum computation is not yet available, recent advances towards small-scale quantum computers [1,2] have spurred interests in seeking noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) [3] devices that offer unmatched performance beyond the capability of classical devices. The theoretical proof of a quantum advantage over classical computation [4,5] further inspires the search for quantum-assisted schemes tailored for practical tasks. In this regard, quantum variational schemes, in conjunction with classical optimization, are widely applicable to tasks including quantum state preparation [6], variational eigensolvers [7,8], state diagonalization [9], and machine learning [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%