2017
DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2016.1157188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the complete convergence for martingale difference sequence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since ( 4) and ( 5) hold true, the sequence of empirical errors {[( Pki h − P h )V * h+1 ](x, a)} K i=1 can be interpreted as a martingale difference sequence (MDS) with respect to the filtration {F} K i=1 [37]. Therefore, we can use the Azuma-Hoeffding inequality to give a concentration result [38] for each index in the MDS, i.e., to construct confidence bounds for Q * h ∀ h ∈ {1, 2, .…”
Section: From the Error [( Pkimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since ( 4) and ( 5) hold true, the sequence of empirical errors {[( Pki h − P h )V * h+1 ](x, a)} K i=1 can be interpreted as a martingale difference sequence (MDS) with respect to the filtration {F} K i=1 [37]. Therefore, we can use the Azuma-Hoeffding inequality to give a concentration result [38] for each index in the MDS, i.e., to construct confidence bounds for Q * h ∀ h ∈ {1, 2, .…”
Section: From the Error [( Pkimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miao et al [ 5 ] improved some known results and studied the Baum–Katz type convergence rate in the Marcinkiewicz–Zygmund strong law for martingales. Chen et al [ 6 ] also gave some extended results for the sequence of martingale difference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%