1951
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/38.3-4.330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Comparison of Several Mean Values: An Alternative Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
710
0
16

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,172 publications
(744 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
710
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…25 The Welch test of equality of means was used for data not satisfying the equal-variance assumption. 26 Upon determination that the means were significantly different, post hoc tests were used to determine which means were different from one another. Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test was used to test data with equal variances, 27 and the Games−Howell test was used to analyze data that did not satisfy the equal-variances assumption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 The Welch test of equality of means was used for data not satisfying the equal-variance assumption. 26 Upon determination that the means were significantly different, post hoc tests were used to determine which means were different from one another. Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test was used to test data with equal variances, 27 and the Games−Howell test was used to analyze data that did not satisfy the equal-variances assumption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Welch's (1951) unequal-variance test was used to analyze data that were heteroscedastic. Subsidiary post hoc contrasts were performed using Tukey HSD tests or Welch tests as appropriate.…”
Section: Latent Profile Analysis Of Hypnotic Respondingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results in Tables 8 and 9 show that the Anova and Welch (1951) tests reject the null hypothesis of Neutral Forecast Updates for the inflation rate at the 5% level of significance, but do not reject the null hypothesis for the real GDP growth rate. As seen in Table 3, the primary and revised forecasts are very similar for the inflation rate, whereas the initial and primary forecasts are not, so that P-I is not close to R-P.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%