2018
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2018.2833152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Comparison of Gauge Freedom Handling in Optimization-Based Visual-Inertial State Estimation

Abstract: It is well known that visual-inertial state estimation is possible up to a four degrees-of-freedom (DoF) transformation (rotation around gravity and translation), and the extra DoFs ("gauge freedom") have to be handled properly. While different approaches for handling the gauge freedom have been used in practice, no previous study has been carried out to systematically analyze their differences. In this paper, we present the first comparative analysis of different methods for handling the gauge freedom in opti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the NLLS problem (6) has certain ambiguities related to g(•), and parameters that are different by such transformations are equivalent. Note that in practice, a unique solution can be obtained by enforcing additional constraints [11].…”
Section: A Ambiguities and Equivalent Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the NLLS problem (6) has certain ambiguities related to g(•), and parameters that are different by such transformations are equivalent. Note that in practice, a unique solution can be obtained by enforcing additional constraints [11].…”
Section: A Ambiguities and Equivalent Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to a gauge freedom [89] of absolute position, velocity, and heading of the estimated solution. There are multiple approaches [99] to remedy gauge freedom and here, the simplest approach was taken. At the first keyframe for the lumbar IMU, a prior of zero position, zero velocity, and zero heading angle were set.…”
Section: Other Priorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with respect to an offset rotation [19], [20]) and using the straightforward representations for position and velocity, we obtain a twelve-dimensional parameter space (of which we plot 2D slices). As it is observed, the landscape of the objective function is complex, but it has a clear minimum, reachable provided the solver is initialized in its basin of attraction.…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Optimization Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%