2017 IEEE-RAS 17th International Conference on Humanoid Robotics (Humanoids) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/humanoids.2017.8239545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the common-mode and configuration-dependent stiffness control of multiple degrees of freedom hands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work completes and extends the preliminary study presented in Ruiz Garate et al ( 2017 ). Though the general idea remains the same, validation experiments have been performed, and several key factors of the control strategy have been improved.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This work completes and extends the preliminary study presented in Ruiz Garate et al ( 2017 ). Though the general idea remains the same, validation experiments have been performed, and several key factors of the control strategy have been improved.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Being K t represented by a 3D ellipsoid, differently from Ruiz Garate et al ( 2017 ), where the whole translational matrix numerical values were targeted, here we define the task requirements by means of high-level features of the grasp stiffness ellipsoid geometry. Our method is therefore designed to target, in descending order of importance:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The work presented here aims to exploit these concepts of CDS and CMS to regulate the grasp stiffness of a robotic hand while assuring its stability. This approach differs from the one in [19] first from the problem definition perspective. Being able to represent the grasp stiffness by an ellipsoid, the method proposed here focuses on reproducing its main geometrical features, instead of the overall stiffness matrix numerical values targeted before.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%