2004
DOI: 10.1002/jnm.549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the combination of the method of auxiliary sources with reaction matching for the analysis of thin cylindrical antennas

Abstract: SUMMARYIn the present paper, a combination of the method of auxiliary sources (MAS) with the reaction matching (RM) technique is investigated for the treatment of thin wire antennas. The influence of the use of additional monopole terminal sources on the numerical stability and the accuracy of the solution is thoroughly studied for both scattering and radiating antennas. Although the proposed method (MAS-RM) is somehow similar to the method of moments (MoM) with sinusoidal basis and testing functions, it posse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed method is an extension of the method presented in [8] for a single dipole. The MAS is a well-established numerical method, which has been recently recognized to be a branch of the generalized multipole techniques (GMTs) [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed method is an extension of the method presented in [8] for a single dipole. The MAS is a well-established numerical method, which has been recently recognized to be a branch of the generalized multipole techniques (GMTs) [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (5), the vector F D stands for the EM field generated by a sinusoidal dipole, while the vectors F + M and F − M stand for the EM fields generated by the upper and lower half of a sinusoidal dipole, respectively, which correspond to the positive and negative monopoles described in [8].…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations