2019
DOI: 10.1002/jgt.22452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the clique number of the square of a line graph and its relation to maximum degree of the line graph

Abstract: In 1985, Erdős and Nešetřil conjectured that the square of the line graph of a graph G, that is, L G ( ) 2 , can be colored with G Δ( ) 5 4 2 colors. This conjecture implies the weaker G Δ( ) 2 . Molloy and Reed proved J Graph Theory. 2019;92:261-274. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jgt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common element of the proof is a lemma about the Ore-degree σ G of G, the largest over all edges of G of the sum of the two endpoint degrees. The following generalises a recent result due to Faron and Postle [4].…”
Section: No Triangles or No 5-cyclessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A common element of the proof is a lemma about the Ore-degree σ G of G, the largest over all edges of G of the sum of the two endpoint degrees. The following generalises a recent result due to Faron and Postle [4].…”
Section: No Triangles or No 5-cyclessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…We should remark that Dȩbski and Śleszyńska-Nowak [17] announced a bound of roughly 7 4 ∆ t . Note that the bound in Theorem 8 can be improved in the cases t ∈ {1, 2}: ω(L(G)) ≤ ∆ + 1 is trivially true, while ω(L(G) 2 ) ≤ 4 3 ∆ 2 is a recent result of Faron and Postle [10]. We also have a bound on ω(L(G) t ) analogous to Theorem 7, a result stated and shown in Section 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Conjecture 2 remains open, but is closer to being proved than Conjecture 1. The second author proved that x L 2 ðGÞ ð Þ 3 2 D 2 [28], which was improved to 4 3 D 2 by Faron and Postle [14]. There are also sharp results for specific classes of graphs: for bipartite graphs the upper bound is D 2 [16] (sharp for complete bipartite graphs), and for triangle-free graphs it is 5 4 D 2 [3, Theorem 4.1.5] (sharp for blowups of C 5 ).…”
Section: > < >mentioning
confidence: 96%