2007
DOI: 10.1101/sqb.2007.72.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Chronobiology of Cohabitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been renewed interest in social stimuli as circadian zeitgebers [57][59], and the present results suggest that social synchrony can involve circadian oscillators outside of the light-entrainable SCN pacemaker. Comparative studies of scheduled mating and restricted feeding should reveal whether natural rewards affect a common circadian oscillator for anticipatory appetitive behaviors, or whether different populations of circadian clock cells are recruited by different reward stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…There has been renewed interest in social stimuli as circadian zeitgebers [57][59], and the present results suggest that social synchrony can involve circadian oscillators outside of the light-entrainable SCN pacemaker. Comparative studies of scheduled mating and restricted feeding should reveal whether natural rewards affect a common circadian oscillator for anticipatory appetitive behaviors, or whether different populations of circadian clock cells are recruited by different reward stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…2C), confirming true entrainment. Of note, the free-running period in DD (τ) showed prominent aftereffects of the previous entraining cycle, i.e., it was relatively short in the 23.33-h T-cycle group (23.58 ± 0.03 h, n = 3) and relatively long in the 24.67-h T-cycle group (24.58 ± 0.04 h, n = 4) compared with the species-typical τ close to 24 h (as documented in the literature over the past few decades) (11,12). Interestingly, τ was statistically indistinguishable from the period of the previous T cycle for the 24.67-h animals (95% confidence interval for τ of 24.45-24.71 h) but not for the 23.33-h animals (23.45-23.70 h).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Other important factors are social cues or influence of the group activity that may synchronize slightly divergent internal clocks of individual rats [11][13]. As the research on circadian rhythms has been variably performed on singly-housed and group-housed animals, this factor must also be taken into account when discussing mechanisms of circadian cycle of activity [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%