1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-8018(98)00014-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the choice of data transformation for modelling time series of significant wave height

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a procedure consists of determining the transformation function f, generation of realizations of the process {X t } and then transforming the generated samples of {X t } into samples of {Y t } using f. A number of such models for the significant wave height have been proposed in the literature (e.g. Cunha and Guedes Soares (1999), Walton and Borgman (1990) for the univariate time series for significant wave height, H s , Guedes Soares and Cunha (2000), Monbet and Prevosto (2001) for the bivariate time series for significant wave height and mean wave period, (H s , T) and DelBalzo et al (2003) for the multivariate time series for significant wave height, mean wave period and mean wave direction, (H s , T, H m )). However, it is noted that the duration statistics of transformed Gaussian processes has been demonstrated not to fit too well with data, even though the occurrence probability is correctly modelled (Jenkins 2002).…”
Section: Stationary Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a procedure consists of determining the transformation function f, generation of realizations of the process {X t } and then transforming the generated samples of {X t } into samples of {Y t } using f. A number of such models for the significant wave height have been proposed in the literature (e.g. Cunha and Guedes Soares (1999), Walton and Borgman (1990) for the univariate time series for significant wave height, H s , Guedes Soares and Cunha (2000), Monbet and Prevosto (2001) for the bivariate time series for significant wave height and mean wave period, (H s , T) and DelBalzo et al (2003) for the multivariate time series for significant wave height, mean wave period and mean wave direction, (H s , T, H m )). However, it is noted that the duration statistics of transformed Gaussian processes has been demonstrated not to fit too well with data, even though the occurrence probability is correctly modelled (Jenkins 2002).…”
Section: Stationary Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) (Cunha and Guedes Soares, 1999). For wave period, it is only necessary to remove seasonal trends.…”
Section: Synthetic Climate Dataset Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For wave data, the Box-Cox shape parameter, 位 = 0 and the transformation takes the form of Eq. 2 where Y t is the transformed time series and 碌 ln(Hst) is a Fourier Series estimate of the time series of the logarithm means [8].…”
Section: ) Ar Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%