2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the chemical potential of nanoparticle dispersion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, where the indices stand for a constant temperature and pressure and 𝑔 is the free energy of dispersion of the nanoparticles in the fluid. This is not equal to the standard free energy of mixing of blends or binary liquids, but is newly derived for dispersions and suspensions in [36]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, where the indices stand for a constant temperature and pressure and 𝑔 is the free energy of dispersion of the nanoparticles in the fluid. This is not equal to the standard free energy of mixing of blends or binary liquids, but is newly derived for dispersions and suspensions in [36]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where 𝑉 is the volume of one nanoparticle, 𝜉 ≡ −2 ∆ is the nanoparticle-fluid interaction parameter, with 𝑧 the coordination number (number of nearest lattice neighbours for both the solvent and particles), 𝑘 Boltzmann's constant and ∆𝑤 = 𝜀 − 𝜀 + 𝜀 the difference in interaction energy between like and unlike neighbours, with 𝜀 , 𝜀 and 𝜀 , respectively, the particle-fluid, particle-particle and fluid-fluid interaction energies (more information is given in [36]). The minus sign in the expression of the 𝜉 parameter indicates that for nanofluid dispersions to be stable, this suggests an exothermic enthalpy of mixing [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Respectively, the reaction energy ( ΔE ) and the energy barrier ( E a ) were defined by the formula ΔE = E (P) – E ( R) and E a = E (TS) – E (R). The chemical potential μ (SAC) was described as μ (SAC) = [ E (SAC) – n (O) μ (O) – n (Co3O4) μ (Co3O4) ] – [ E (Co3O4) + μ (Mn) ]. , The electron localization function (ELF) was derived from ELF = (1 + χ σ 2 ) −1 . More computational details are supplied in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 38 ) The chemical potential μ (SAC) was described as μ (SAC) = [ E (SAC) – n (O) μ (O) – n (Co3O4) μ (Co3O4) ] – [ E (Co3O4) + μ (Mn) ]. 39 , 40 The electron localization function (ELF) 41 was derived from ELF = (1 + χ σ 2 ) −1 . More computational details are supplied in the Supporting Information .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dissolution lifetime is the time required for the largest particles in the polydisperse NP population to completely dissolve (Utembe et al, 2015). The dissolution rate constant can be obtained by two methods: (i) thermodynamic approach involves calculations of Gibbs free energy (G) (for the system comprising of NPs, dissolved material and solvent) as the function of particle size (Hellmann & Tisserand, 2006; Machrafi, 2020; Tang, 2005), and (ii) graphical approach uses linear plots of integrated rate laws (e.g., zero order, first order, Higuchi square root law, Weibull model, etc. ).…”
Section: In Vitro Dissolution Testing: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%