The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2000
DOI: 10.1109/36.841993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the characterization of agricultural soil roughness for radar remote sensing studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
150
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these experiments, 25 m long roughness profiles were acquired on agricultural fields with different tillage conditions. A thorough analysis of the complete data set of roughness profiles is reported by Davidson et al [2000]. In this paper, it is shown that over distances >5-10 m, multiscale features clearly characterize the surface correlation properties.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these experiments, 25 m long roughness profiles were acquired on agricultural fields with different tillage conditions. A thorough analysis of the complete data set of roughness profiles is reported by Davidson et al [2000]. In this paper, it is shown that over distances >5-10 m, multiscale features clearly characterize the surface correlation properties.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to in situ measurements [32] and [33], the fractal dimension D of natural soil surface profiles is usually smaller than about 1.5.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) Find X (j) 13b (for TM case) or X (j) 23b (for TE case) over Region 3 by the backward propagation principle; just like FBM/SAA for PEC rough surface, the FBM/SAA is used to calculate the backward components of induced currents along the CSSPOSII through small matrix D 33 (for TE case) or C 33 (for TM case).…”
Section: Fbm/saa For Dielectric Rough Surface With a Conducting Sspomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental soil profiles are proved to be locally fractal over a spatial range of a few centimetres (Zribi et al 2005b), the soil surfaces can be considered as fractal surfaces. Also, natural surfaces are often better described using random fractals instead of stationary single scale processes (Davidson et al 2000). It should be emphasized that the fractal dimension (D) can easily be estimated with the help of SAR scattering coefficient values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%