2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(00)00070-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the characteristics of tubular materials for hydroforming—experimentation and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7) can be fitted best to the experimental data for austenitic stainless steels [12,20] for IN 718 [21] and for SS 304 [7], while for aluminum alloys, the Hollomon hardening law (Eq. 8) was reported to give the best fit [22]:…”
Section: Hydroforming Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7) can be fitted best to the experimental data for austenitic stainless steels [12,20] for IN 718 [21] and for SS 304 [7], while for aluminum alloys, the Hollomon hardening law (Eq. 8) was reported to give the best fit [22]:…”
Section: Hydroforming Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, tensile test data have been determined from flat sheet products (i.e., materials used to manufacture the tube by roll forming, welding, and sizing) to determine the properties of the tubular forms. However, the tube manufacturing process changes the mechanical response/ properties of the material from that in the initial sheet condition; for instance, Koç et al [7] reported a difference in the flow behavior of tubular products from that of the blank sheet and Sokolowski et al [8] confirmed this difference by performing interrupted free expansion and tensile tests for SS 304. This discrepancy in the mechanical response may be even more prominent for seamless tubes that are manufactured from billet forms that undergo substantial changes in the microstructure and, thus, the mechanical response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depending on the component and the rate of production involved, hydroforming processes can lead to an increase in the involved costs, and a possible way to lower these costs could be the adoption of numerical simulation tools for the process design. Previous works including the Finite Element Method in the simulation of hydroforming processes can be found in references [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Focusing on process for joining of open blanks, tailorwelded techniques refer to the class of joining procedures on flat blanks, which are subsequently subjected to forming operations [10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tube hydroforming could become an interesting solution for forming metallic liners as used in pressurized hydrogen storage. It has been demonstrated that material data obtained from tube bulging are more suitable to simulate hydroforming process than the classical tensile test ( [3], [4]). In [5], an analytical approach of tube bulging tests has been developped, based on geometric observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%