1936
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9904-1936-06372-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the characteristic roots of matric polynomials

Abstract: Each normal C n image of a line meets each base 5 n _2 in n -2 points and does not intersect the ruled variety.The images of planes intersect R in (n-\-l)(n -2)/2 lines. The plane meets each base 5 n -2 in a point, the image of which is a line meeting n of the base 5 n '_2 and lying on F 2 . Each base S n -2 meets R in a manifold of dimensionality n -3 and of order n -1. For ^ = 4, the two-dimensional variety of order 5 has an infinite number of plane elliptic cubic curves, but the corresponding property is no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

1952
1952
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently the concept of triangularizabüity has attracted some attention; see [2,6,7]. Also, for some earlier finite dimensional results see McCoy [9,10]. In this paper we show that if A is a closed algebra of compact operators, then A is triangularizable if and only if A/rad(A) is commutative (where rad(A) denotes the Jacobson radical of A).…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Recently the concept of triangularizabüity has attracted some attention; see [2,6,7]. Also, for some earlier finite dimensional results see McCoy [9,10]. In this paper we show that if A is a closed algebra of compact operators, then A is triangularizable if and only if A/rad(A) is commutative (where rad(A) denotes the Jacobson radical of A).…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Further it is easily seen that the two matrices To show that property 1 does not imply property 2 consider the two matrices (2) There is no difference in the scope of this definition if "function" is interpreted as polynomial, rational function, or power series. That these matrices do not possess property P can be checked easily since the characteristic roots of P lie on the main diagonal of P: the matrix AB does not in this case have the characteristic roots Xiju¿.…”
Section: Quasi-commutativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proved by Frobenius [l] that any function f(A, B) of two commutative «X« square matrices A, B has as characteristic roots the numbers /(X¿, Hi) where X¿ are the characteristic roots of A and pi the characteristic roots of B, both taken in a special ordering independent of the function /. However, commutativity of A and B is known not to be a necessary condition [2]. Matrices which have the above property are said to have property P. Recently M. Kac suggested a study of matrices A, B of a less restricted nature, namely those for which any linear combination aA +ßB has as characteristic roots the numbers a\i+ßpi.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations