2013
DOI: 10.1186/1687-1847-2013-350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Cauchy problem for a weakly dissipative μ-Degasperis-Procesi equation

Abstract: In this paper, we study the Cauchy problem of a weakly dissipative

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, Lemma 2.1 and u = g * y, g ≥ 0 imply y(t, x) and u(t, x) have the same sign with y 0 (x). Moreover, from the proof of Theorem 5.1 in [10], we have u x (t, x) ≥ −|µ 0 |. Now note that given t ∈ [0, T ), there is a ξ(t) ∈ S such that u x (t, ξ(t)) = 0 by the periodicity of u to x-variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Firstly, Lemma 2.1 and u = g * y, g ≥ 0 imply y(t, x) and u(t, x) have the same sign with y 0 (x). Moreover, from the proof of Theorem 5.1 in [10], we have u x (t, x) ≥ −|µ 0 |. Now note that given t ∈ [0, T ), there is a ξ(t) ∈ S such that u x (t, ξ(t)) = 0 by the periodicity of u to x-variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Proof. Except for (4) and 5, all of the conclusions in Lemma 2.2 can be found in [10]. So we only need to prove (4) and (5) here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations