2004
DOI: 10.1086/381912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Carbon and Nitrogen Abundances of 47 Tucanae's Main-Sequence Stars

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
91
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
91
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A clearly bimodal anticorrelation is detected here (Fig. 7), which confirms the results by Harbeck et al (2003) and Briley et al (2004a) and which, together with the double SGB and wide MS found by Anderson et al (2009), demonstrates the presence of two distinct populations in this cluster.…”
Section: Ncg 104 (47 Tucanae)supporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A clearly bimodal anticorrelation is detected here (Fig. 7), which confirms the results by Harbeck et al (2003) and Briley et al (2004a) and which, together with the double SGB and wide MS found by Anderson et al (2009), demonstrates the presence of two distinct populations in this cluster.…”
Section: Ncg 104 (47 Tucanae)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Various studies identified CN bimodalities among red giants of M 3 and M 13 (Suntzeff 1981;Briley et al 2004b), NGC 6752 (Norris et al 1981), ω Cen (Cohen & Bell 1986), NGC 6934 (Smith & Bell 1986), NGC 6171 (Smith 1988), M 71 (Smith & Penny 1989;Lee 2005), M 2 (Smith & Mateo 1990), M 5 (Ramírez & Cohen 2002), NGC 288 and NGC 362 (Kayser et al 2008), NGC 6121 (Marino et al 2008), NGC 6356, and NGC 6528 (Martell & Smith 2009), among others. Bimodalities among MS and sub-giant branch stars have also been found in M 71 (Cohen 1999), 47 Tuc (Cannon et al 1998;Harbeck et al 2003;Briley et al 2004a;Carretta et al 2005), and NGC 6752 .…”
Section: Ch and Cn Bimodalitiesmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While changes in [C/Fe], [N/Fe], and 12 C/ 13 C ratios as a function of evolutionary state on the subgiant branch (SGB) and red giant branch (RGB) are clearly linked to in situ mixing processes (e.g., Denissenkov & VandenBerg 2003), the temperatures reached near the bottom of the convective envelope in more evolved low-mass RGB stars are too low to significantly alter the abundances of heavier elements (but see also D'Antona & Ventura 2007 for a possible exception). Observations of similar star-to-star abundance variations among scarcely evolved globular cluster mainsequence and SGB stars (e.g., Briley et al 1996Briley et al , 2004Gratton et al 2001;Ramírez & Cohen 2002, 2003Carretta et al 2004;Cohen & Meléndez 2005;Bragaglia et al 2010;D'Orazi et al 2010;Dobrovolskas et al 2014) indicate that the composition differences between the various globular cluster populations were already imprinted on the gas from which the stars formed. Although there is still no consensus regarding the nucleosynthesis source(s) driving the composition differences, possible options include intermediate mass (∼5-8 M e ) asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars (e.g., Karakas et al 2006;, rapidly rotating massive (20 M e ) main-sequence stars (e.g., Decressin et al 2007a), massive binary stars (de Mink et al 2009), and super massive (∼10 4 M e ) stars (Denissenkov & Hartwick 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%