1999
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1999.6211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Cancellation Problem in Calculating Compressible Low Mach Number Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, anomalies or computational difficulties with using conservative methods have been reported, such as the low Mach number flow [5][6][7][8][9][10], sonic point glitch [11], carbuncle phenomenon [12], and others [4,[13][14][15][16]. In this paper, we focus on the problems of compressible flows with contact discon-tinuities and/or material interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, anomalies or computational difficulties with using conservative methods have been reported, such as the low Mach number flow [5][6][7][8][9][10], sonic point glitch [11], carbuncle phenomenon [12], and others [4,[13][14][15][16]. In this paper, we focus on the problems of compressible flows with contact discon-tinuities and/or material interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed that this is due to the problem of 'cancellation' errors. Sesterhenn et al [9] demonstrated that this is a potential issue even at Ma ≈ 0.02.…”
Section: Numerical Test Casesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The perturbation formulation is employed to minimize cancellation errors when discretizing the Navier-Stokes equations for compressible low Mach number flow (Sesterhenn et al, 1999;Müller, 2008). The conservative form of the 2D compressible Navier-Stokes equations in perturbation formulation can be written as…”
Section: Fluid Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%