1974
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.1974.1128250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Calibration Process of Automatic Network Analyzer Systems (Short Papers)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At first the well-known one-port error box model of a reflectometer used by Rehnmark (1974) is shown as a flow graph in Fig. 2.…”
Section: The Database Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first the well-known one-port error box model of a reflectometer used by Rehnmark (1974) is shown as a flow graph in Fig. 2.…”
Section: The Database Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RF input power is divided into two, with half being delivered to port 1 and half being used as a reference to resolve the relative amplitude and phase information at coupling ports A and R. To calibrate port 1 as a virtually perfect reflectometer, we employed the conventional three-term error model [15,16]. This model deals with three dominant and systematic error terms in an actual reflectometer, known as the directivity (e00), port match (e 11 ), and reflection tracking (e 10 e 01 ) errors at the port; these terms are readily extracted using Eq.…”
Section: ⅱ One-port Calibration With a Photonic Linkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7. The conventional error model for calibrating the forward one-path, two-port system is a five-term error model [15,16]. With a second port (port 2), transmission tracking (e10e32) and port 2 mismatch (e22) terms are added, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Fig 8 Five-term Error Model For Two-port Calibration (A Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All measurement and characterization steps were the same as Hackborn"s method, but the signal flow graph was analyzed node by node, resulting in explicit expressions for the DUT parameters. Later, in June 1973, Stig Rehnmark, using Kruppa and Sodomsky"s technique, would present an article with 292 explicit formulas using Hand"s model, thus giving explicit solutions for DUT parameters in the more sophisticated and more commonly used error model [48]. Kruppa Consider a cascade of two 2-port devices as shown in Appendix Fig.…”
Section: A57mentioning
confidence: 99%