2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2010.00657
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Brumer-Stark Conjecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
45
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in a recent preprint [11], Dasgupta and Kakde unconditionally proved the Brumer-Stark conjecture (we do not review the statement), except for the 2-components. A promising strategy to prove the Brumer-Stark conjecture had been again to descend from the (equivariant) Iwasawa main conjecture (e.g., Greither and Popescu [19]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, in a recent preprint [11], Dasgupta and Kakde unconditionally proved the Brumer-Stark conjecture (we do not review the statement), except for the 2-components. A promising strategy to prove the Brumer-Stark conjecture had been again to descend from the (equivariant) Iwasawa main conjecture (e.g., Greither and Popescu [19]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In more recent work, using the work [11], Nickel [25] proved the eTNC − p as long as all the p-adic primes are almost tamely ramified, without assuming the vanishing of the µinvariant. Also, using the work [11], Johnston and Nickel [21] proved the relevant Iwasawa main conjecture without assuming the vanishing of the µ-invariant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations