2006
DOI: 10.1002/aic.10831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the breakup of fluid particles in turbulent flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

17
209
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
17
209
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Andersson and Andersson (2006) observed single droplet breakup with a high speed camera and concluded that equal sized breakup is the most probable. In this work the daughter droplet size distribution function was assumed to be a uniform probability function, meaning that the droplets obtained after a breakage event have the same size.…”
Section: The Daughter Droplet Size Distribution Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Andersson and Andersson (2006) observed single droplet breakup with a high speed camera and concluded that equal sized breakup is the most probable. In this work the daughter droplet size distribution function was assumed to be a uniform probability function, meaning that the droplets obtained after a breakage event have the same size.…”
Section: The Daughter Droplet Size Distribution Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turbulent flows viscous droplets were shown to stretch to long threads, up to 20 times the initial droplet diameter (Andersson and Andersson, 2006). The thread diameter then becomes $ 0.18d, based on the conservation of volume.…”
Section: The Daughter Droplet Size Distribution Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not absolutely clear which of the models accurately represents realistic behaviour as evidenced by the published experimental results on bubble breakup, which are sometimes contradictory. Hesketh et al (1991) and Andersson and Andersson (2006) claim that binary breakup is the most probable event for bubble breakup, while Risso and Fabre (1998) observed breakups that formed more than ten fragments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, the possibility of non-binary breakage for liquid-liquid systems may occur where 261 internal viscosity of the dispersed phase can produce multiple daughter drops, the assumption of 262 binary breakage is still valid as air viscosity is low and thus the bubbles cannot form an extremely 263 elongated shape (Andersson and Andersson, 2006 agitated using a Rushton turbine was adopted for both the validation and multi-compartment 272 modelling. The stirred tank is considered to be operating in a fully dispersed regime (N > N CD ) for 273 better gas dispersion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%