2007
DOI: 10.1021/ie070360w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Breakage of Liquid−Liquid Dispersions in Turbulent Pipe Flow:  Spatial Patterns of Breakage Intensity

Abstract: The breakage of droplets in turbulent pipe flow is a subject of great technological interest. The purpose of this work is to take advantage of state-of the-art theoretical developments and obtain quantitative predictions enhancing our physical understanding of this problem. From this perspective, the subject of the “exact” solutions to an appropriate mathematical model, being recently an issue in the literature, is clarified. Furthermore, the simplest possible mathematical model of the breakage process is deri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the g particle size is about 280 m (measured particles at the outlet of flocculation tank) whereas the f particle size is in most cases smaller than 100 m (estimated from the simulations). Employing the simplest of the methods of moments, the so-called monodisperse approximation (which have been proved useful for engineering calculations [25]) the function f can be approximated as f(x) = Nı(x − x o ) where ı is the Dirac delta function, N is the total fresh particles number concentration, x o is the average volume of these particles defined as =M f /N where M f is their total volume concentration (volume fraction). The corresponding volume fraction of the mud particles is denoted M g and it is the only needed quantity related to g(x).…”
Section: The Coagulation Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the g particle size is about 280 m (measured particles at the outlet of flocculation tank) whereas the f particle size is in most cases smaller than 100 m (estimated from the simulations). Employing the simplest of the methods of moments, the so-called monodisperse approximation (which have been proved useful for engineering calculations [25]) the function f can be approximated as f(x) = Nı(x − x o ) where ı is the Dirac delta function, N is the total fresh particles number concentration, x o is the average volume of these particles defined as =M f /N where M f is their total volume concentration (volume fraction). The corresponding volume fraction of the mud particles is denoted M g and it is the only needed quantity related to g(x).…”
Section: The Coagulation Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rozentsvaig (1981) pointed out that the contribution of viscous shear may be significant to droplet breakage in pipe flows, and he modified the model in an attempt to reconcile it with the published experimental data. It has been observed by a number of investigators, including Kostoglou and Karableas (2007) that a "stable" droplet size may not really exist. Recall that the Kolmogorov microscale is given by η = (ν 3 /ε) 1/4 and the corresponding velocity scale is v(η) = (εν) 1/4 .…”
Section: Droplet Breakagementioning
confidence: 99%