1969
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1969.31.505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Brauer splitting theorem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As remarked in the discussion preceeding the proposition, (2) and (3) [18] and [21] characters T defined in such a way that they are in a one-to-one correspondence with the B i. (i)] is finitely generated, projective and separable over S. Now, suppose that R is a connected ring which does not split G, but GI U(R).…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As remarked in the discussion preceeding the proposition, (2) and (3) [18] and [21] characters T defined in such a way that they are in a one-to-one correspondence with the B i. (i)] is finitely generated, projective and separable over S. Now, suppose that R is a connected ring which does not split G, but GI U(R).…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the group character T M :G-+R is defined by T M {g) = χ? =1 FiigX^ for any fir in G ( [8], §2).…”
Section: (A) Let R Be a Dedekind Domain And H = {J Such That P ~ φσFcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2); that is, RG ~ ©Σ?=i Hom R ,(P i9 Pi). Since R f is a local ring (see the proof of Theorem 2 in [8]) and P 4 is a finitely generated and projective R'-module for each i, P< is a free Jϊ'-module for each i ( [6], Th. 12 in Chapter 9).…”
Section: ί =mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation