Applications of Heat, Mass and Fluid Boundary Layers 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-817949-9.00016-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the bivariate spectral quasilinearization method for nonlinear boundary layer partial differential equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since U in equation ( 70) is known at the boundaries of the domain, rewriting equation (70) for the interior points Journal of Applied Mathematics of the domain, yields the new expression…”
Section: Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since U in equation ( 70) is known at the boundaries of the domain, rewriting equation (70) for the interior points Journal of Applied Mathematics of the domain, yields the new expression…”
Section: Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jamil et al [66] studied the unsteady MHD micropolar-nanofluids with homogeneousheterogeneous chemical reactions over a stretching surface using the BI-SLLM. Since both BI-SQLM and BI-SLLM face challenges with problems of large time scales, Motsa et al [67] and Magagula et al [68] proposed the nonoverlapping multidomain spectral collocation methods, i.e., multidomain BI-SLLM [69] and multidomain BI-SQLM [65,70]. Later, Mkhatshwa et al [71] proposed an overlapping multidomain spectral method to study conjugate problems of conduction and MHD free convection flow of nanofluids over flat plates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bivariate Lagrange interpolation polynomial interpolates ωk(η,ξ) at selected grid points (ηi,ξj) in both the η and ξ directions, for i=0,1,2,,Nη and j=0,1,2,,Nξ. These selected grid points are called Chebyshev‐Gauss‐Lobatto points 39–41 and are given by {ηi}=cosπiNηi=0Nη,1.0em{ξj}=cosπjNξj=0Nξ, and i(η)=i=0ikNηηηkηiηk, where i(ηk)=δik={00.25em0.1emif0.1em0.25emik10.25em0.1emif0.1em0.25emi=k. The nonlinear operators Ωk, for k=1,2,…”
Section: Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the ξ derivatives are computed at the Chebyshev‐Gauss‐Lobatto grid points (ηi,ξj), as (for j=0,1,2,,Nξ) center center left0.33emωnξ(ηi,ξj)=ω=0Nημ=0Nξωn(ηω,ξμ)MJX-tex-caligraphicscriptLω(ηi)dMJX-tex-caligraphicscriptLμ(ξj)dξ=μ=0Nξdjμωn(ηi,ξμ), where djμ=dμ(ξj)dξ is the jth and μth entry of the standard first derivative Chebyshev differentiation matrix of size (Nξ+1)×(Nξ+1), given by References [39–41,43]. The values of the space derivatives at the Chebyshev‐Gauss‐Lobatto points (ηi,ξj) (for i=0,1,2,,Nη) are similarly computed as ωnη(ηi,ξj)=ω=0...…”
Section: Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-Newtonian fluid flows past a vertical plate with the flow being influenced by viscous dissipation and a heat source or sink. We intend to implement the BSQLM in this current study as it is reported by Magagula et al [30] that the method is computationally efficient and gives solutions that are more uniformly accurate than traditional methods like the finite difference methods. Although the BSQLM does not handle periodic boundary conditions properly, the method is considered because it is easy to implement and it takes little time to converge to the exact solution with few grid points, Rai and Mondal [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%