2010
DOI: 10.1112/s0010437x09004436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the birational p-adic section conjecture

Abstract: In this article we introduce and prove a Z/p meta-abelian form of the birational p-adic section conjecture for curves. This is a much stronger result than the usual p-adic birational section conjecture for curves, and makes an effective p-adic section conjecture for curves quite plausible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, this follows immediately from [12], Theorem A, (2). This completes the proof of Proposition 1.7.…”
Section: Then Any Pro-c Birational Galois Section Ofsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, this follows immediately from [12], Theorem A, (2). This completes the proof of Proposition 1.7.…”
Section: Then Any Pro-c Birational Galois Section Ofsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Then it follows from a result obtained in [8], as well as [12], that, for each p ∈ P f k , a birational Galois section s of X/k uniquely determines a k p -valued point x p of X such that, for any open subscheme U ⊆ X of X, the image of the homomorphism G p → π 1 (U ⊗ k k p ) naturally determined by the isomorphism π 1 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most convincing evidence consists perhaps in Koenigsmann's proof in [17] of a birational analogue for function fields in one variable over a local p-adic field. A minimalist metabelian pro-p approach to Koenigsmann's theorem was successfully developed by Pop in [33], whereas Esnault and Wittenberg,[8,Prop. 3.1], were able to reprove algebraically the abelian part via the cycle class of a section.…”
Section: Evidence For the Section Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one only assumes that this condition holds, without assuming the liftability condition, then the proof of the main theorem of Pop is still valid in this case (cf. the details in the proof of the main results in [3]). Now, going back to the proof of Theorem A, assertion (A3) implies in our situation that the natural map p Br k → p Br L; where L is as above, is injective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%