2019
DOI: 10.1090/proc/14518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the bilinear Hilbert transform along two polynomials

Abstract: We prove that the bilinear Hilbert transform along two polynomials B P,Q (f, g)(x) = R f (x−P (t))g(x−Q(t)) dt t is bounded from L p ×L q to L r for a large range of (p, q, r), as long as the polynomials P and Q have distinct leading and trailing degrees. The same boundedness property holds for the corresponding bilinear maximal function M P,Q (f, g)(x) = sup ǫ>0 1 2ǫ ǫ −ǫ |f (x − P (t))g(x − Q(t))|dt.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This concept was inspired by Gowers' work in [7] and crucial in [14]'s study of bilinear Hilbert transforms along monomials. Such a strategy involving the σ-uniformity was later often used to study variants of the bilinear Hilbert transform, for example, the polynomial case in [15], the general curve case in [8] and the bipolynomial case in [4]. Since we have transformed the bipolynomial to a general curve, our treatment in Section 6 is similar to those in [14,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concept was inspired by Gowers' work in [7] and crucial in [14]'s study of bilinear Hilbert transforms along monomials. Such a strategy involving the σ-uniformity was later often used to study variants of the bilinear Hilbert transform, for example, the polynomial case in [15], the general curve case in [8] and the bipolynomial case in [4]. Since we have transformed the bipolynomial to a general curve, our treatment in Section 6 is similar to those in [14,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lacey–Thiele's breakthrough study of BHT has generated numerous investigations in multilinear operators. One direction of generalizing BHT is to replace the linear terms +t and t with some non‐linear polynomials P and Q, and consider the operator 0trueBP,Q(f,g)(x):=f(xPfalse(tfalse))g(xQfalse(tfalse))0.16emdtt,1emf,gscriptS(R).See the articles of Li , Li–Xiao and the first author for some recent results about BP,Q. Motivated by many works on discrete linear operators (see, for example, Bourgain , Ionescu–Wainger , Krause , Mirek–Trojan , Mirek–Stein–Trojan , Pierce , Zorin–Kranich , etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See the articles of Li [22,23], Li-Xiao [24] and the first author [8] for some recent results about B P,Q . Motivated by many works on discrete linear operators (see, for example, Bourgain [3], Ionescu-Wainger [16], Krause [18], Mirek-Trojan [29], Mirek-Stein-Trojan [27,28], Pierce [30], Zorin-Kranich [35], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%