On the Best Way to Cut a Body Area Network's Wires

Abstract

New technologies can help to develop preventive healthcare, thereby leading to significant life quality improvements. Medical Body Area Networks are expected to become a key element in tomorrow's medical IT infrastructure by enabling the long term collection and analysis of health parameters. For this vision to become a reality, several challenges must be addressed. This work focuses on the technological aspects of ultra low power consumption, low latency and packet error rate. We consider and evaluate state of the art technologies currently under evaluation by the IEEE Standard Association 802.15.6 task group on body area networks, using detailed network simulation models, which have been calibrated with hardware measurements whenever possible and with MATLAB communication link simulations otherwise. We observe that the expected power consumption levels are similar for all considered platforms, and that they are determined mainly by the medium access control protocol. Trade-offs between communications latency, throughput and power consumption are identified. The performance of the Ultra Wideband Impulse Radio system is clearly impacted by its lack of carrier sensing capability. We conclude that the existing technologies are mature enough and that the remaing obstacles to widespread adoption are organizational and societal. Index Terms-UWB, Impulse Radio, FM-UWB, narrow band, body area network, sensor network, 802.15.4A, 802.15.6, healthcare, MAC, ultra low power

An Ultra Wideband Survey: Global Regulations and Impulse Radio Research Based on Standards

“…A comparative study is reported in [45] which compares IR-UWB, FM-UWB, and a commercially available narrow band radio in terms of power consumption, reliability, and latency. The UWB specifications were partially taken from the WPAN standard and also from the WBAN draft standard.…”

Energy efficient UWB-WUR dual-radio solution for WBANs

“…The proposed dual-radio approach for the medicine diffusion device is illustrated in Figure 2. By using this approach, there is no need to implement UWB receiver to the sensor node which is more power consuming than UWB transmitter [20]. The hub node includes IEEE Std.…”