2015
DOI: 10.1137/140985627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Bertozzi--Esedoglu--Gillette--Cahn--Hilliard Equation with Logarithmic Nonlinear Terms

Abstract: Abstract. Our aim in this paper is to study the existence of local (in time) solutions for the Bertozzi-Esedoglu-Gillette-Cahn-Hilliard equation with logarithmic nonlinear terms. This equation was proposed in view of applications to binary image inpainting. We also give some numerical simulations which show the efficiency of the model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analogy between the Cahn–Hilliard model in material sciences and Cahn–Hilliard model in image inpainting is that the two state phases are considered as two homogeneous regions and the interface is considered as an edge. In image inpainting, it was exploited by Bertozzi et al in , see also , by considering the following equation: {arrayarraytu+normalΔ(εnormalΔu1εW(u))+λD(uf)=0,arrayinR+×normalΩ,arrayun=0andnormalΔun=0,arrayonR+×normalΩ,arrayu(0,x)=f,arrayinnormalΩ, which was obtained by incorporating the data fidelity term λ D ( f − u ). Note that the classical Cahn–Hilliard equation is only appropriate for two‐scale (binary) images inpainting because of the double well potential W that vanishes on only the values 0 and 1.…”
Section: Cahn–hilliard Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analogy between the Cahn–Hilliard model in material sciences and Cahn–Hilliard model in image inpainting is that the two state phases are considered as two homogeneous regions and the interface is considered as an edge. In image inpainting, it was exploited by Bertozzi et al in , see also , by considering the following equation: {arrayarraytu+normalΔ(εnormalΔu1εW(u))+λD(uf)=0,arrayinR+×normalΩ,arrayun=0andnormalΔun=0,arrayonR+×normalΩ,arrayu(0,x)=f,arrayinnormalΩ, which was obtained by incorporating the data fidelity term λ D ( f − u ). Note that the classical Cahn–Hilliard equation is only appropriate for two‐scale (binary) images inpainting because of the double well potential W that vanishes on only the values 0 and 1.…”
Section: Cahn–hilliard Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where .u/ The analogy between the Cahn-Hilliard model in material sciences and Cahn-Hilliard model in image inpainting is that the two state phases are considered as two homogeneous regions and the interface is considered as an edge. In image inpainting, it was exploited by Bertozzi et al in [21], see also [7,23,[43][44][45][46][47], by considering the following equation:…”
Section: Cahn-hilliard Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, numerical methods that preserve this sort of property (for example a finite difference scheme analyzed in [11]), where the discrete solution stays in (−1, 1), circumvent any need for ad hoc processing of the recovery image. For inpainting applications, the Cahn-Hilliard inpainting model (1.1) with a logarithmic potential W log has been studied in [13] for the existence of weak solutions, and numerical simulations performed with W log reach steady states faster than simulations with W qu . Due to the technical difficulty in showing the spatial mean value of u stays strictly in the open interval (−1, 1) for arbitrary reference time intervals, the authors in [13] can only prove a local-intime existence result, and so it is not known if the solution eventually blows up after some finite time, nor if the solution converges to an equilibrium (which is the desired recovery image we seek).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equation was studied, endowed with Neumann boundary conditions, in [6], [7], [10], [17], and [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the existence of local (in time) solutions to (1.1) with logarithmic nonlinear terms has been studied in [18] (note indeed that the original Cahn-Hilliard equation was actually proposed with thermodynamically relevant logarithmic nonlinear terms which follow from a mean-field model; regular (and, in particular, cubic) nonlinear terms are approximations of such logarithmic nonlinear terms). In that case, we can obtain better results than those obtained with polynomial nonlinear terms in [17], as far as the convergence time is concerned, in particular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%