Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2504730.2504746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the benefits of using a large IXP as an internet vantage point

Abstract: In the context of measuring the Internet, a long-standing question has been whether there exist well-localized physical entities in today's network where traffic from a representative cross-section of the constituents of the Internet can be observed at a fine-enough granularity to paint an accurate and informative picture of how these constituents shape and impact much of the structure and evolution of today's Internet and the actual traffic it carries.In this paper, we first answer this question in the affirm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, unfortunately for the common researcher, these studies have-so far-been dominated by the analysis of large, restricted, and proprietary datasets. For instance, the wellknown content delivery network (CDN) dataset used for most contemporary IPv6 analyses [15,8], Internet exchange point (IXP) datasets, which were used regularly by some other research groups [3,9], or, slightly less restrictive, the Farsight DNS recursor dataset [21]. Although public datasets do exist, they are traceroute-based datasets from various sources, including the RIPE Atlas project [17], which are limited due to their nature: they are biased towards addresses of networking equipment, and, in turn, bear their own set of problems for meaningful analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unfortunately for the common researcher, these studies have-so far-been dominated by the analysis of large, restricted, and proprietary datasets. For instance, the wellknown content delivery network (CDN) dataset used for most contemporary IPv6 analyses [15,8], Internet exchange point (IXP) datasets, which were used regularly by some other research groups [3,9], or, slightly less restrictive, the Farsight DNS recursor dataset [21]. Although public datasets do exist, they are traceroute-based datasets from various sources, including the RIPE Atlas project [17], which are limited due to their nature: they are biased towards addresses of networking equipment, and, in turn, bear their own set of problems for meaningful analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This becomes increasingly important as many CDNs continuously deploy servers at the network edges or within ISPs. Thus, one can not infer the operator of a cache by simply looking at the IP address or AS number [15]. As we show above, RIPE and RV public prefix sets uncover by far more IPs than the other prefix sets.…”
Section: Tracking the Expansion Of Cdns Footprintsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our first vantage point at a large European IXP allows us to obtain an authentic view of BACnet traffic in the Internet [6]. The IXP is located in central Europe and interconnects about 700 ASes which exchange more than 5 Tbit/s at peak times.…”
Section: Ixp Flow Datamentioning
confidence: 99%