1964
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112064000258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the behaviour of small disturbances in plane Couette flow

Abstract: In an earlier paper (Gallagher & Mercer 1962) the numerical results for the first eigenvalue of the problem of plane couette flow were given. The higher eigen-values are now examined and are found to be in agreement with those of Southwell & Chitty (1930), but to disagree with those of Grohne (1954).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, when Re = 1,000 it is necessary to take N 1 = N 2 = 45. A first check of the accuracy of the numerical method was performed by comparing the present results with available results for the plane Couette flow of a homogeneous fluid (e.g., [11]), and confirming excellent agreement. A further check was performed by comparing the growth rates of the two-layer channel flow with those obtained by an alternative shooting method based on fourth-order Runge-Kutta integration (e.g., [12, p. 452]).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…For example, when Re = 1,000 it is necessary to take N 1 = N 2 = 45. A first check of the accuracy of the numerical method was performed by comparing the present results with available results for the plane Couette flow of a homogeneous fluid (e.g., [11]), and confirming excellent agreement. A further check was performed by comparing the growth rates of the two-layer channel flow with those obtained by an alternative shooting method based on fourth-order Runge-Kutta integration (e.g., [12, p. 452]).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…structure for all values of IY.R. They also clearly exhibit the phenomenon of "mode crossing" concerning which there has been some controversy recently, but they do not bear directly on the disagreement found by Gallagher and Mercer (1964) between their results for IY. = 2 which did not show any mode crossing and the results of Grohne (1954) which did.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This result is not however of primary importance as we shall explain in the next section. The first notable numerical attack was made by Gallagher & Mercer (1962). They carried out an extensive numerical investigation of the basic twodimensional Orr-Sommerfeld problem for moderate values of a and R such that aR was less than about 1000, and indeed found that the flow was stable for this parameter range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%