2015
DOI: 10.1111/obes.12091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Behaviour of Phillips–Perron Tests in the Presence of Persistent Cycles

Abstract: In this paper we provide a detailed analysis of the impact of persistent cycles on the wellknown semi-parametric unit root tests of Phillips and Perron (1988, Biometrika 75, 335-346). It is shown analytically and through Monte Carlo simulations that the presence of complex (near) unit roots can severely bias the size properties of these unit root test procedures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(65 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…case. Our results are in line with those obtained in Del Barrio Castro et al (2011), Del Barrio Castro et al (2013), and Del Barrio Castro et al (2015 11 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…case. Our results are in line with those obtained in Del Barrio Castro et al (2011), Del Barrio Castro et al (2013), and Del Barrio Castro et al (2015 11 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The study harnessed two robust econometric techniques: fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) and canonical cointegrating regression (CCR), which were specifically employed for robust analysis. Additionally, the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) [ 100 ] and Phillips-Perron (PP) [ 101 ] tests were employed to assess unit roots in the series, using a significance level of 5 %.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicting macroeconomic data is challenging due to stochastic trends, which must be eliminated before analysis. Projections with such data are unlikely, so the focus is on the specific period being studied [ 101 ]. To ensure reliability, the researcher employs the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) and Phillips Perron (PP) tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%