2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the behaviour of flattened tubular Bi-axial and Tri-axial braided composites in tension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2D biaxial braided prepregs were manufactured by circular braiding loom with 96 bobbin tows carriers (Herzog GLH 1/97/96-100) at Gemtex laboratory, shown in Figure 6 a. Based on the unit cell geometry, braiding process parameters as production speed and carrier rotational speed were chosen to obtain three different circular braided preforms [ 52 ]: BR-A, BR-B, and BR-C, as shown as Figure 6 b. BR-A and BR-B possess the same braiding angle but a different tow waviness ratio and cover factor; BR-B and BR-C possess the same tow waviness ratio and cover factor but a different braiding angle. The circular braids BR-A and BR-C are wider than BR-B to facilitate comparative study, the unit cell width of BR-A and BR-C is equal by controlling the braiding process parameters.…”
Section: Materials and Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2D biaxial braided prepregs were manufactured by circular braiding loom with 96 bobbin tows carriers (Herzog GLH 1/97/96-100) at Gemtex laboratory, shown in Figure 6 a. Based on the unit cell geometry, braiding process parameters as production speed and carrier rotational speed were chosen to obtain three different circular braided preforms [ 52 ]: BR-A, BR-B, and BR-C, as shown as Figure 6 b. BR-A and BR-B possess the same braiding angle but a different tow waviness ratio and cover factor; BR-B and BR-C possess the same tow waviness ratio and cover factor but a different braiding angle. The circular braids BR-A and BR-C are wider than BR-B to facilitate comparative study, the unit cell width of BR-A and BR-C is equal by controlling the braiding process parameters.…”
Section: Materials and Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the results of the program from a manufacturing perspective were encouraging, aligned with the conventions of the composites industry, the project considered uniform braid angles of ±45º, i.e., a quasi-isotropic layup, for all the beams in the chassis. Thus, the resulting design was sub-optimal and did not exploit the potential offered by the correlation reported between properties and braid angle in previous studies [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. As the structural performance is a combined outcome of material properties (dependent on braid angle) and geometry (dependent on braid angle and number of layers), this study investigates the potential of improving the structural efficiency, i.e., per unit weight mechanical performance, by considering different braid angles and number of layers in different beams across the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…as well as physical properties (thickness, weight etc.) on braid angle [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. These parameters combine to define the overall structural performance, therefore controlling the braid angle is an excellent avenue for tailoring braided composites without adding any cost or time to the braiding process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has shown that the braid angle is directly related to the properties of the produced composite. For example, braiding at a higher braid angle leads to an increase in the thickness of the braided tows, therefore increasing the thickness of the braided component [5]. The mechanical properties of braided composites including elastic properties as well as mechanical strength have been shown to depend on braid angle [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%