2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-5493(01)00440-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the automated assessment of nuclear reactor systems code accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where | Δ F ( f 0 ) | is the mean value of the difference signal and it is equivalent to the mean error (ME) in the time domain as defined in ref. [8]. The measure fraction A0 shows when the frequency amplitudes are dominating or when the mean values (like constant differences) are dominating the sum of the amplitudes.…”
Section: Average Amplitudementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where | Δ F ( f 0 ) | is the mean value of the difference signal and it is equivalent to the mean error (ME) in the time domain as defined in ref. [8]. The measure fraction A0 shows when the frequency amplitudes are dominating or when the mean values (like constant differences) are dominating the sum of the amplitudes.…”
Section: Average Amplitudementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the transient related to the pressure drop has more or less ended. Tables 3 and 4 shows the comparison of FFTBM and Automated Code Assessment Program (ACAP) (Kunz et al, 2002) accuracy measures for the calculated pressurizer pressure and rod surface temperature shown in Figs. 4 and 5, respectively.…”
Section: Moving Averagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…But on the other hand, the original FFTBM method has been effectively applied in obtaining information on code accuracy by several researchers in the literature. More recently, an automated code assessment program (ACAP) has been developed to provide a quantitative comparison between nuclear reactor system code results and www.intechopen.com Fourier Transforms -Approach to Scientific Principles 448 experimental measurements (Kunz et al, 2002). For the time record data the original FFTBM accuracy measure was modified and a new continuous wavelet transformation accuracy measure was included among several other accuracy measures developed for timing of events tables, scatter plots and steady state data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides FFTBM also other methods have been available for comparison of the experimental and calculated data (e.g. automated code assessment program (ACAP) (Kunz et al, 2002), stochastic approximation ratio based method (SARBM) (Prošek, 2002b;Prošek and Mavko, 2003b)). Nevertheless, only the FFTBM provides a procedure to quantify the whole calculation and therefore it is very widely used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%