2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the attenuating effect of permeability on the low frequency sound of an airfoil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aforementioned works consider only stationary bodies and represent porosity with the Rayleigh conductivity of a thin perforated surface, which neglects any viscous effects within the pores. Weidenfeld & Manela [11] predicted that porous noise reductions can indeed persist when a viscous Darcy porosity condition is applied to a pitching aerofoil. However, to be useful in the design of any practical application, these aeroacoustic works need a complementary assessment of porosity on the aerodynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned works consider only stationary bodies and represent porosity with the Rayleigh conductivity of a thin perforated surface, which neglects any viscous effects within the pores. Weidenfeld & Manela [11] predicted that porous noise reductions can indeed persist when a viscous Darcy porosity condition is applied to a pitching aerofoil. However, to be useful in the design of any practical application, these aeroacoustic works need a complementary assessment of porosity on the aerodynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, the sound is generated by the complex vortices and their interactions around the flapping wings that include three main vortices: leading edge vortex, trailing edge vortex and wing tip vortex [19][20][21]. The dominating sound sources are expected to be of a dipole type consisting of a) the wings motion, b) the vortex-structure interactions, and c) permeability [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, caution should be exercised in the large-frequency limit, which is beyond the realm of physical validity of the mathematical modelling employed in this paper: as discussed by Howe (1979) and noted more recently by Weidenfeld & Manela (2016), the present modelling assumptions for porosity are only valid when there is Stokes flow in the pores passing through the wing, which is rendered invalid at large frequencies. We expect that a higher-order (e.g.…”
Section: Porous Extensions Of Standard Unsteady Aerodynamic Functionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The expansion of the jump in surface pressure across the aerofoil into a series of weighted Chebyshev polynomials has previously been applied to aerodynamic problems for impermeable (Rienstra 1992) and permeable (Weidenfeld & Manela 2016) aerofoils. The weighted Chebyshev expansion (also referred to as a Glauert–Fourier series) is an essential feature of many reduced-order discrete-vortex models (Ramesh et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%