2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-42531-9_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Asymptotic BER of MMSE Detector in Massive MIMO Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear detectors, i.e., ZF and MMSE [67], [88], [6], [7] • If columns of the propagation matrix are nearly orthogonal, they work properly. • Relatively simple to implement.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear detectors, i.e., ZF and MMSE [67], [88], [6], [7] • If columns of the propagation matrix are nearly orthogonal, they work properly. • Relatively simple to implement.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the QR decomposition in these nonlinear detectors leads to high computational complexity and low parallelism because of the inclusion of unfavorable matrix operations, such as element elimination. In contrast, suboptimal linear detectors, such as minimum mean square error (MMSE) [5] and zero forcing (ZF) [6], provide a better trade-off between SER and computational complexity, but their complexity still reaches three times the number of transmitting antennas .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the QR decomposition in these nonlinear detection schemes can lead to low parallelism and high computational cost because of the inclusion of matrix operations such as element elimination. Therefore, to cope with the complexity issue, researchers have considered suboptimal linear detection methods, such as the linear minimum-mean-squared error (MMSE) detector [16], which is computationally less expensive, and it has shown good performance for massive MIMO systems, in particular for a favorable propagation environment and a large loading ratio (M/K) [4], where M and K denote the number of receive and transmit antennas, respectively. It is considered near-optimal for massive MIMO and occupies the benchmark place for most linear iterative detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%