1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-5687(96)02506-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the asymmetry of bifurcations in the bronchial tree

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weibel's symmetric model geometry is a representative anatomic airway model with averaged dimensions. Although most bronchial bifurcations are somewhat asymmetric [32] and non-planar, some studies [33,34] have shown that inspiratory flow in an asymmetric bifurcation exhibits the main features of the symmetric case.…”
Section: Upper Airway Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weibel's symmetric model geometry is a representative anatomic airway model with averaged dimensions. Although most bronchial bifurcations are somewhat asymmetric [32] and non-planar, some studies [33,34] have shown that inspiratory flow in an asymmetric bifurcation exhibits the main features of the symmetric case.…”
Section: Upper Airway Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minor effects of cartilaginous rings (Martonen, Yang, & Xue, 1994), which may appear especially in the upper airways, and out-ofplane bifurcations have not been considered in the present analysis. Although most bronchial bifurcations are somewhat asymmetric (Horsfield, Dart, Olson, Filley, & Cumming, 1971;Philips & Kaye, 1997) and non-planar, some studies (Chang, 1989;Liu, So, & Zhang, 2003) have shown that inspiratory flow in an asymmetric bifurcation exhibits the main features of the equivalent symmetric case. Non-planar geometries only influence the flow in downstream bifurcations (Caro, Schroter, Watkins, Sherwin, & Sauret, 2002;Zhang & Kleinstreuer, 2002).…”
Section: Upper Airway Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual path of the particle, i.e., through either the major or the minor daughter branch, is randomly selected from the¯ow splitting distribution based on cross-sectional area ratios Phillips and Kaye, 1997). As a consequence of the variability of the selected sequence of airways, all paths of inspired particles are different from each other, and so are the deposition probabilities in the individual airways (Note: by de®-nition, the same path is taken upon exhalation).…”
Section: Stochastic Particle Deposition Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%