The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018ja025826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Asymmetry Between Upward and Downward Field‐Aligned Currents Interacting With the Ionosphere

Abstract: The paper presents results from the numerical study of the magnetosphere-ionosphere interactions driven by the large-scale electric field in the magnetically conjugate, high-latitude regions of northern and southern hemispheres. Simulations of the two-fluid MHD model demonstrate that these interactions can lead to a generation of a system of small-scale, intense field-aligned currents with a significant difference in size and amplitude between the upward and downward currents. In particular, in both hemisphere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the spiky peaks of the electric field coincide with the regions of plasma density depletions. This is similar to the numerical results of Lysak and Song (2002), but in contrast to the simulation results presented in Figure 3 of Streltsov (2018). While in the steady‐state the downward j ∥ (corresponding to upward motion of ionospheric electrons) is expected to peak at the location of the maximum density gradient, this is not necessarily the case in a dynamic situation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Second, the spiky peaks of the electric field coincide with the regions of plasma density depletions. This is similar to the numerical results of Lysak and Song (2002), but in contrast to the simulation results presented in Figure 3 of Streltsov (2018). While in the steady‐state the downward j ∥ (corresponding to upward motion of ionospheric electrons) is expected to peak at the location of the maximum density gradient, this is not necessarily the case in a dynamic situation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The important feature of the simulated electric field illustrated in Figures e and f is that it reproduce reasonably well the “spiky” character of the small‐scale electric fields observed at low altitudes by the DMSP satellite (Figure d). It has been shown by Streltsov () that these “spikes” are the characteristic feature of the small‐scale electric fields produced by the IFI on its latter, strongly nonlinear stage of the development. Because one of the main goal of this study was to reproduce DMSP observations using the background parameters from CRRES, the paper shows the results from the simulation when strong “spikes” appears in the electric field at low altitudes, at this time the “spiky” character of the field also becomes visible in the equatorial magnetosphere.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This field contains large‐amplitude positive spikes: If the field is detrended by removing the low‐frequency part, then the amplitude of the positive peaks in EPW will be 3–5 times larger than the amplitude of the neighboring negative peaks. This is a characteristic feature of the small‐scale electric fields produced by the IFI simultaneously developing in two magnetically conjugate regions in the ionosphere (Streltsov, ). These fields are associated with the narrow, downward field‐aligned currents interacting with the ionosphere.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations